Request Manager
Manage and monitor your team's progress on tasks - all in one platform.
Summary
Scispot, an all-in-one digital toolkit marketed towards biotech startups, encountered obstacles when enabling users with the ability to efficiently manage their teams and track their progress on tasks.
Our team has developed a request manager feature, empowering users to seamlessly share tasks and documents with their teammates directly within the platform.
March - April 2023
Team
Satya S. (Product Manager)
Rafael P. (Head of Engineering)
Thomason Z. (Software Engineer)
Saathana C. (Software Engineer)
My Role
User Research, UX Design, Prototyping, Testing
Background
Leaders face challenges in managing and collaborating with their teams.
Scispot offers a toolkit to biotech startups and science labs, simplifying research and company development. The platform enables users to manage their protocols, experiments, and documents electronically. Despite this, Scispot lacked team-management tools within the platform, making it difficult for scientists to guide their teams and work collaboratively with their others.
What are the challenges?
After interviewing some current users of the platform, I discovered 2 main issues that many faced.
Ideation
Market Research
I looked at popular team management platforms such as Monday.com and Smartsheet. Understanding common ways other team-management platforms enable users to supervise their team gave me an understanding of common feature patterns.
Being able to assign roles to users and project tracking was a feature that many Scispot users could benefit from - and the focus of my design.
Key Requirements
Construct the product in a scalable way.
As we were constrained by time, we knew we could not build everything we wanted to for the initial release of the request manager. I aimed to design the request manager in a scalable manner that would seamlessly integrate with Scispot’s current functionalities.
Design
User Flow
Drawing insights from other popular team management platforms such as Monday.com or Smartsheet, and speaking to a few of our current users, I developed a user flow that I believed would align with the requirements that I previously outlined. In addition, I had to ensure the flow was simple enough to develop within the deadline of 2 weeks.
I developed a user flow consisting of three primary stages. I decided on criteria that would be important for the request to have, such as a due date, description, and documents.
First Iteration (MVP)
Because of time constraints, I didn't have time to conduct explorations and design low-fidelity prototypes. I instead went straight to designing an MVP.
User Testing + Findings
Conduct 1 hour user testing sessions.
I conducted user testing sessions with two participants. My objective was to identify any points in the user flow that needed improvements. I asked our participants to “think out loud” and voice their frustrations or satisfactions as they created a request.
Second Iteration
Gather findings to help guide the next iteration of design.
After learning more about the participants' satisfactions and frustrations through user testing, I worked to make improvements to the overall design and experience in the Figma prototype.
Next Steps + Reflection
Active user participation is crucial to creating a truly exceptional product.
All assumptions about the users should still be thoroughly tested by the users themselves. I found that user interviews and research really helped to guide and validate my design process when I was stuck.
Explore alternative designs and user flows.
Due to the time constraints imposed on the team, I had limited opportunity to explore alternative designs or user flows. Given more time, I would have liked to minimize the amount of "explanations" or descriptive text required to guide users through the product. In the future, I would like to conduct more explorations to test different user journeys and designs that may be more intuitive.